The Pasteurization of France, trans. A. Sheridan and J. Law, Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press, , BRUNO LATOUR The ‘Franslatcd by Aian Sheridan andjolin r^iw The Pasteurization of France Bruno Latour Translated by Alan Sheridan and John Law. The Pasteurization of France [Bruno Latour, Alan Sheridan, John Law] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. What can one man accomplish.
|Published (Last):||21 April 2011|
|PDF File Size:||17.49 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.38 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The network of gestures and skills that the hygienists wanted to set up had to be as continuous as an oil pipeline. He observes that as Napolean and Published October 15th by Pasteurizayion University Press first published In sum, it is an indisputable case and and therefore a perfect example for my argument.
August 20, at 7: How are we to distinguish be- tween the years and how are we to produce a better periodization? But the pasteurizaton Richet, in the same article, uses a quite different model to establish the priorities of frznce discoveries about diphtheria: In other words, in order to know what has happened in the war, whether it is the war in the battle field or the war in the laboratory, we should know nothing but the power relation among the actors in the system — who are allies and who are enemies and how they are associated with each other.
This double game of explanation — one creating po- tency, the other setting out the trials of strength — might seem no more than an amusing oddity. Disinfectants also had their place: Instead of dividing the realm patseurization those who empirically study science in the making and those who claim to guard the borders or establish the foundations of science, I combine the two, and it is together that they should stand or fall.
The analyst does not need to know more than they; he laour only to begin at any point, by recording what each actor says of the others. It was to try to distinguish retrospectively what had been in- tentionally confused. Jousset de Bellesme asks indignantlyp. Pasteur had already given himself up to the francr ambitious hopes.
Aug 30, Mark Bowles rated it really liked it. Pasteur’s success depended upon a whole network of forces, including the public hygiene movement, the medical profession both military physicians and private practitionersand colonial interests.
Is this an “ideological” rendering of what really caused the French defeat? What can one man accomplish, even a great man and brilliant scientist? We believe that which we expect something from in return; in this sense belief is based, like knowledge, on the extension of safe networks that allow things to go and come back.
The Pasteurization of France by Bruno Latour
Yet Pasteur was not the only scientist working on the relationships of microbes and disease. We ought to ask history to display the same humihty that we have asked sociology to do. Those who reject social studies of science reject it because they believe it is reducitonist and is laour of science. There is no boundary between science and society 3.
The Will to Truth.
Trivia About The Pasteurizatio In the second part, I work out the principles to show how other politicoscientific mixtures can be studied in the same way. This is why the contribution of the hygienists is difficult to Strong Microbes and Weak Hygienists 49 isolate from that of their allies.
What I call the pzsteurization mechanism shows how bacteriology got into the end of the parasitical chain and found itself able to express a whole period. The Pasteurians translated these stakes and rules into their own terms, but without the hygienists, it is clear that framce little would have been heard about them.
To reestablish democracy in the troubled time of the religious wars, Spinoza had to become agnostic as far as the biblical text was concerned and to devise new ways of understanding the shocking mixture of evangelical messages and massacres. Pasteur said he could not claim the honor of being a surgeon; I cannot claim that of being a historian. But what is the point? Before, they could not decide. Strong Microbes and Weak Hygienists. Want to Read Currently Reading Read.
The Pasteurization of France
For them, certain things had not changed since Galen. Only a non modern can use these concepts while investigating microbes and wars.
Scientific rhetoric often channels the reader’s attention in a single central franfe, like 20 War and Peace of Microbes a valley cutting through mountains. What intentions and what interest will we attribute to them? November 23, at 7: Because you would need an a priori existing nature and society for this.
No, he had only to open his mouth, and others would turn his results into generalizations about every disease. The class struggle may be stemmed at one point, only to reappear at another through contagion.
Latour here selects some control groups and sees how they reacted to Pasteur. His name is te yet associated with anything relating to disease.