God in the Age of Science?: A Critique of Religious Reason is a book by the Dutch philosopher Herman Philipse, written in English and published in the. Given, however, that we are living in the age of science, Philipse argues that the natural theologian is faced with a dilemma he calls “The. God in the Age of Science?: A Critique Of Religious Reason. by. Herman Philipse . Philipse tackles religion from an epistemilogical point of view whereas most.
|Published (Last):||25 April 2007|
|PDF File Size:||17.94 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||1.44 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
There are many ways of addressing the truth questions of religion, and whether one feels it’s worth digging into this book depends on whether natural theology is seen as the best way to assess the truth. He sciende the view that laws of nature are causes: Oxford University Press, Nick marked it as to-read Oct 19, Kenneth Konyndyk – – Religious Studies 27 3: Don’t have an account?
Andrew marked it as to-read Mar 27, Vidur Kapur marked it as to-read Nov 17, The Predictive Tye of Theism David marked it as to-read Mar 28, Analogy, Metaphor, and Coherence 8. Thanks for telling us about the problem.
God in the Age of Science?: A Critique of Religious Reason – Oxford Scholarship
In part I Herman Philipse assesses these xcience and argues that the most promising for believers who want to be justified in accepting their creed in our scientific age is the Bayesian cumulative case strategy developed by Richard Swinburne.
Jay Dougherty marked it as to-read Dec 24, David marked it as to-read May 26, With regard to the domain of science, Philipse places great value on the power of agf methods to make predictions.
Herman Philipse Utrecht University. Bibliomantic marked it as to-read Apr 11, The chapters addressing Plantinga are instructive to the tone of the rest of the book.
God in the Age of Science?: A Critique Of Religious Reason
Moreover, even without any predictions capable of distinguishing competing hypotheses, one can have an intelligent discourse on ways to unify the same phenomena under different explanatory frameworks, but far more subtle work on this topic was done in the twentieth century by John Wisdom’s “Parable of the Invisible Gardener,” by subsequent tod and the development of the philosophy of perception, which Philipse does not refer to at all.
Christian rated it it was amazing Sep 05, How much of philosophy generally is commensurate with the methodology of science, and does Philipse’s own book pass this test? The faithful can philipe a creedal statement e.
Belief in God and the Existence of God.
Herman Philipse, God in the Age of Science?: A Critique of Religious Reason – PhilPapers
The question the book explores is what to make of a concept like God in light of modern science, and is largely an exploration of the case made by the philosopher Gos Swinburne.
Publications Pages Publications Pages. Kristina UK marked it as to-read Apr 11, Kirk marked it as to-read Mar 26, Philipse’s vigorous public atheism has, unsurprisingly, brought him into conflict with Islamists in the Netherlands. It’s unfortunate because the critiques of belief itself are ignored as some outcome of one’s gld on the utility of religion, they remain largely unaddressed.
Swinburne’s approach is correct, but unfortunately God is not up to the task of being a proper scientific theory. Retrieved July 14, Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
It is unfortunate that critiques of the utility of religion are taken as the reason for critiques on the truth of religion. In that respect, the book is incredibly useful for the current debate about whether science and religion are compatible.
Jeff Line rated it it was amazing Apr 30, Philipse acknowledges this point indirectly by citing Stephen Jay Gould to the effect that “‘almost every interesting event of life’s history’ is a matter of historical contingency,” a conclusion that, though contested, cannot easily be dismissed because of the difficulty of predicting what living things will evolve from particular initial conditionsfn. Heavy reading from the first paragraph, but excellent.
Classical, Early, and Medieval Prose and Writers: Clarendon Press, As either option is unpalatable, he argues that the best option for phlipse theist is to accept a probabilistic account of scientific and scholarly methods as consisting in rules of inference to the best explanation, “which enable us to assess how probable a hypothesis is in the light of an evidence-set,” the approach he ascribes to Swinburne Indeed, Philipse is at his best, I think, when he challenges claims belonging to revealed theology that have been appropriated and presented as natural theology.
This page was last edited on 28 Decemberat Dave marked it as to-read Dec 24, For dthere are a couple of chapters devoted to exploring the merits of Plantinga’s argument for reformed epistemology.
God in the Age of Science?: And for those who see believing in God as an act of faith, there will be nothing in this book to change their minds. Part II Theism as a Theory. The Laws of Belief Wolfgang Spohn. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Martijn Leeuw rated it it was amazing Sep 14, Mark rated it really liked it Jul 20, In doing so he presents a very strong case for atheism.