1 star because I can’t give it 0. Germar Rudolf: bigot, racist and holocaust denier. German Holocaust Denier Imprisoned for Inciting Racial Hatred: A German. Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of ‘Truth’ and ‘Memory’. At the start of his trial in November, Germar Rudolf had called the Holocaust ‘a. Germar Rudolf, also known as Germar Scheerer, born 29 October , is a German chemist Rudolf knew his work would be associated with Holocaust denial, but insisted that even Remer had a right to legal defense. ), ISBN ; Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of Truth and Memory.
|Published (Last):||11 February 2012|
|PDF File Size:||7.16 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.43 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
In his book he describes how mostly Jewish concentration camp guards in Polish camps took gruesome revenge on innocent Germans who had been rounded up more or less at random. The reason for this media cover-up may be rather simple, as the following shows:.
Holocaust Handbooks: Germar Rudolf: ‘Dissecting the Holocaust’
During World War II the Germans developed microwave ovens, and the only place where this technology was used during the war was as a delousing device in Auschwitz. This is where revisionist criticism comes in, as documentary evidence for this theory is more than scarce or even indicates that the opposite is true. In fact, the gas chambers seem to be ever decreasing in importance as a killing method, as opposed to mass shootings. And if we consider these eyewitness as unreliable, how can we assume that similar eyewitness accounts about Auschwitz and other camps are more reliable?
No commercial use by third parties is permitted. Holocaust trivialization criticism Armenian genocide Serbian genocide Holodomor Rwandan genocide Cambodian genocide Srebrenica massacre Nanjing massacre.
Dissecting the Holocaust: Ernst Gauss: The Controversy about the Extermination of the Jews
Dossecting terrorism against one’s convictions or opinions was the only problem we had to wrestle with today, we might almost consider ourselves lucky, since, after all, one might expect that the authorities would protect us from this if they want to be acknowledged as authorities of a legitimate ‘state under the rule of law’.
And so, isn’t any discussion of it superfluous? Dissectinh view was recently supported by Jerusalem rdolf Yehuda Bauer. When the cultural and social integration of the Jews in Germany became a reality in the course of the 19 th century, this development also heralded one of the greatest and most fruitful symbioses that ever connected two peoples. Ball’s work as well, even though it already dates from late has yet to receive a single word of notice from the establishment historians.
Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. According to Nolte, and in accordance with the UN Human Rights Convention, science and research must be permitted to question everything without exception.
The crimes themselves were never investigated by a court, but presumed to be self-evident, namely on the basis of the conclusions of rudolv Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunals. When writing about the actual events of physical extermination of the Jews, witness statements are almost the exclusive form of evidence in establishment historiography.
Search other online stores using the book-price search-engine links provided below, or when yermar other stores use the ISBN number provided above. The question arises, of course, whether the thesis that not as many Jews died as had been presumed, and particularly not in the manner believed, can possibly constitute an insult to our Jewish fellow-citizens.
They should be able to get it for you. Open Preview See a Problem? The direct implications of holofaust analysis for the alleged extermination camps Treblinka and Belzec are obvious. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad Steven L.
Inthe University of Stuttgart asked Rudolf to withdraw his application for a final PhD examination, or it would be denied, rendering his PhD thesis worthless. Accepting this definition, one could indeed consider that the crime of genocide would exist even without a planned, industrial-style mass extermination of the Jews, especially through poison gas and mass executions.
Anyone who tries to make the legitimacy of the Federal Republic of Germany’s existence hinge on the truth or falsehood of historiography about a detail of contemporary history and almost all the major media and many politicians have been doing this latelysuffers from a profound misconception of the foundations of this Republic, which is not gerrmar on the Holocaust but on the agreement of its citizens and on inalienable human and dissectjng rights.
Ernst Nolte, Berlin, Germany. Return to the Harry W. Get the Whole Series….
Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of ‘truth’ and ‘memory’
Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Presiding Judge Peter Stockhammer of the Nuremberg District Court, for example, cautioned the author of the present article that he might be committing a criminal offence if he were to support the theses of grmar accused, A.
Rudolf and his associates had earned this money by selling Holocaust denial publications which are banned in Germany, but Rudolf’s business was in the UK and the US.
However, Richard Green and Jamie McCarthy from The Holocaust History Project have criticized the report, saying that like Fred Leuchter in the Leuchter reportRudolf did not discriminate against the formation of iron-based cyanide compounds, which are not a reliable indicator of the presence of cyanide, so that his experiment was seriously flawed.
Ahmad rated it liked it Aug 21, Inin light of the fact that no document has ever yet been found in which Hitler ordered the murder of the Jews or which reveals his awareness or approval of the mass murder, D. Both authors content themselves with choosing, from amongst the masses of all that is available, only such documents that they find appealing, and then combining them into an overall picture that reflects their bias.
It is to be hoped that revisionist historians will be able to resist the Faustian temptation to intoxicate themselves on their power that probably will increase in future. Roxy Volesky marked it as to-read Oct 08, But can the issue at stake take into consideration the poor state of the nerves of certain historians and their followers, or is the ascertainment of historical truth the more important issue?
In other words, if Racists, National Socialists and anti-Semites are to be prevented from using Holocaust revisionism for their own political purposes, their opponents have to cover revisionism themselves.