Ann Laura Stoler’s Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Power is a must for all scholars late I98os and early IS, concerns that Stoler has been working with and. Ann Stoler. Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Power: Race and the Intimate in Colonial Rule. Berkeley: University of California Press, xi + pp. $ . Review of Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Power: Race and the Intimate in Colonial Rule Race and the Intimate in Colonial Rule by Ann Laura Stoler.
|Genre:||Health and Food|
|Published (Last):||20 December 2017|
|PDF File Size:||15.32 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.88 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Power: Race and the Intimate in Colonial Rule
Why, Ann Laura Stoler asks, was the management of sexual arrangements and affective attachments so critical to the making of colonial categories and to what distinguished ruler from ruled?
At the same time, she engages with cutting-edge discussions advanced by postcolonial theorists in recent years. Basing her arguments on generalizations and including information about countries involved in contemporary conflicts, she conflates the histories of many major colonizing powers such as England, Germany, and the Ottoman Empire in the nineteenth century with the ongoing politics of countries such as France, Israel, and the United States today.
As with the natural landscape of Burma, Orwell sets up a contrast between the expectation of fantasy against experience of reality. Her theorization is profound and has wide implications and is certainly extremely Foucauldian and the research that she did to write this goes way beyond impressive. Why, Ann Laura Stoler asks, was the management of sexual arrangements and affective attachments so critical to the making of colonial categories and to what distinguished ruler from ruled?
This is the third time I’ve read it and the first time I’ve read it cover to cover. The writing is scholarly and a I found it a bit difficult to engage caarnal her style in the early chapters. The entire scene of sexual intercourse together with the attendant shame which Flory experiences strongly suggests the link between sexual and imperial domination.
Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Power: Race and the Intimate in Colonial Rule by Ann Laura Stoler
A very deep knowlefge at the colonial attitudes to human sexuality in the Dutch East Indies, in particular to mixed-race unions and their ensuing offspring, but also, to the carnal and intimate relationships within the more traditional colonial home. Jenessa Gerber rated it really liked it Nov 10, She seems to bring remorse and vexation more than she does pleasure or satisfaction.
Their sparse accounts defy a typical understanding of historical narrative, and their unwillingness to discuss the intimate whether for privacy or because of a genuine marking of its unimportance begs the question of who exactly intimate spaces were most sttoler to.
First of all, I disagree with Stoler, and find that the sexual domination of Oriental women is far from merely symbolic.
Finale rated it really liked it Feb 15, To ask other readers questions about Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Powerplease sign up. Although novels and memoirs position European women as categorically absent from the sexual fantasies of European men, these very men imagined their women to be desired and seductive figures to others.
She relies repeatedly on worlds like quotidian and metropole, giving each chapter a sense of redundancy. In that chapter, Stoler presents oral histories gathered from former Indonesian servants of Dutch colonizers.
Theresa rated it it was amazing May 04, Knpwledge often, the historically colonized and the historic colonizers saw one another in a different light. Stoler claims that the other historians have attributed the hardening of racial division in the colonies to the arrival of more racist white women.
In order to create and sustain such perceptions, actions have to be taken. Planters would benefit from an ideology that justified worker exploitation and separation of peoples into mutually antagonistic classes — covering up any possibility of worker unity.
Joo Ok rated it really liked it May 14, She argues knowlsdge in a comparative frame, the state often categorized people using taxonomies for mnemonic purposes. She does not go into detail about the roles women played in the various European knowledfe and she does not go into detail about the emerging ideology of feminism. The beauty of the English rose colonial pretensions rapidly wilts in the face of harsh reality in the colonies.
She does not omperial all the specific laws, what qualified them as racist, and which countries promulgated racist laws.
According to her reasoning, intermarriage and concubinage between the Dutch and the Natives served to widen the rifts between children of mixed marriages, poor whites, the Natives, and the Dutch. This one is probably my least favorite so far. Read, highlight, and take notes, across web, tablet, and phone.
Stoler shows that hybridization took place at the personal, quotidian level, where the Europeans interacted actively with the natives, and in the economic arena, where impoverished Europeans were forced to compete with locals for a good living in ‘their’ colonies.
Specifically, it does not counter her unrelated vilification of France, the United States, and Israel and it conflates history with political thought.
This is a damn good book. Account Options Sign in.